Mintos
Recommended4.0/5
Seven of my loan originators failed and I still came out ahead, which is why it's where I'd point serious money first.
8–12% €50 min MiFID II Buyback
P2P lending in Latvia is a home game — the platforms the rest of Europe uses cross-border are largely Riga's own. Every platform in this ranking accepts Latvian investors. The platforms operate EU-wide, most of them across the whole EEA. We've scored all 15 on the same four dimensions we apply everywhere, with our own money on the top picks. Platforms we rate Not recommended stay in the ranking, with a link that only names the platform.
All 15 P2P lending platforms in this ranking accept investors from Latvia. The loans span consumer, business, real-estate, and agricultural lending. Minimum investments start at €1 and run to €1,000. Advertised returns range from 6% to 15% per year. 11 of the 15 hold a MiFID II or ECSP licence, and the other 4 operate unregulated. The oldest platform here has taken investor money since 2014, the newest since 2023.
Latvijas Banka lists Hive5, Income Marketplace, Loanch, Lonvest, Maclear, and Robocash among companies providing financial services in Latvia that require a licence without one, in a warning updated on 21 September 2026, and advises investors against using such companies. They aren't in this ranking.
Apart from them, this is the same ranking that anchors our European P2P platform ranking. Availability doesn't change the verdicts. Every verified sign-up bonus is listed in the P2P bonus overview, and every market we cover is in P2P lending by country.
4.0/5
Seven of my loan originators failed and I still came out ahead, which is why it's where I'd point serious money first.
8–12% €50 min MiFID II Buyback
3.8/5
Delivers exactly the 6% it advertises, with zero effort required.
Up to 6% €1 min Unregulated None
3.4/5
Licensed, fee-free notes that pay their coupons. The term filter decides your rate.
9–13% €50 min MiFID II Buyback
3.3/5
InRento registers each mortgage for its investors, as their representative. No InRento mortgage had been enforced by October 2026, and two Polish loans went into recovery that autumn.
9.25–11.5% €500 min ECSP Mortgage
3.3/5
Farm loans, mostly against land or machinery, where defaults have become years, not losses.
9–12% €50 min ECSP Mortgage
3.0/5
Coupons paid to the cent under a Latvian licence, but every note funds Nectaro's own DYNINNO group, whose parent company is the largest borrower.
10–14% €50 min MiFID II Buyback
3.0/5
Its loan originators repaid their war-hit loans in full, but PeerBerry couldn't keep my portfolio invested.
8.5–10% €10 min Unregulated Buyback
3.0/5
Licensed in Latvia, but every new security is repaid by one Polish card company.
6–12% €1 min MiFID II None
2.7/5
Pays exactly its advertised rate, but every claim comes from one lending group, with no regulator or buyback behind it.
7.5–10.52% €10 min Unregulated None
2.6/5
Publishes its default figures, and they show 11.19% of its loans defaulting in an average year.
11–15% €100 min ECSP Mortgage
2.6/5
First-rank mortgages under a Bank of Lithuania licence, but a €1,000 ticket earns each loan's lowest rate and the only loan marked late sits beside a 0% default counter.
7.5–10.5% €1,000 min ECSP Mortgage
2.3/5
Creditstar's group guarantee backs its loans' buyback, but most loans on offer sit outside the licence and the top rates demand multi-year lock-ins.
Up to 15% €10 min ECSP Buyback
2.0/5
Each loan's assignment agreement is readable, but no auditor checks the platform's own accounts. Its founders own the loan originators behind most of the money on offer.
7–12% €10 min Unregulated Buyback
1.6/5
Licensed in Latvia, but two-thirds of its book funds one forest fund and its sister fund, and Flow's early exit is a request the issuer may refuse.
9–15% €10 min MiFID II Collateral
1.3/5
About two-thirds of the money out on loan was late or in recovery in October 2026, and the secondary market Estateguru closed in August had no announced reopening by November.
8–11% €50 min ECSP Mortgage
Latvia’s local platforms are in the ranking above, not in a separate list below it. Mintos, Europe’s largest P2P marketplace, is Latvian, and so are TWINO and VIAINVEST, which package consumer loans into notes, Nectaro, which packages mostly business loans to its own group’s companies, Debitum, which mostly sells notes of forestry-land companies, and LANDE, where investors lend directly to farmers, mostly against land and machinery. What the rest of Europe invests on cross-border, Latvian investors have at home.
Every platform in this ranking accepts Latvian investors, and for the Latvian platforms that means investing under home supervision rather than a foreign regulator’s. Indemo, a Riga-based investment firm selling notes on discounted Spanish mortgage debt, hasn’t been through our review process, and the ranking carries only platforms we have reviewed. The three strongest are Mintos, Go & Grow, and VIAINVEST.
The platforms in this ranking operate in euros, and Latvia is in the eurozone. Funding an account is an ordinary SEPA transfer from a Latvian bank, with no currency conversion anywhere in the chain.
Returns arrive in euros too, so what you see in this ranking is what you measure at home. The exchange-rate exposure that non-euro investors carry doesn't apply.
Latvia licenses and supervises P2P lending platforms through Latvijas Banka, its central bank and financial supervisor. A platform licensed under MiFID II or the EU crowdfunding regime answers to its home-country regulator, and that licence passports across the EU. Most of this ranking answers to regulators elsewhere or to no financial supervisor at all, but for the Latvian platforms the home-country regulator is Latvijas Banka itself — every MiFID II investment firm on the list holds its investment-firm licence there, and LANDE its crowdfunding licence.
11 of the 15 hold a MiFID II or ECSP licence, and crowdfunding licences can be checked in ESMA's register. The other 4 operate unregulated, which our Safety dimension prices in.
P2P investments sit outside the €100,000 bank deposit guarantee, and no scheme anywhere covers loans that default. The 5 MiFID II platforms in this ranking (Mintos, VIAINVEST, Nectaro, TWINO, and Debitum) are members of national investor compensation schemes under EU Directive 97/9/EC, which pay up to €20,000 if the firm itself fails to return your instruments or cash. An ECSP licence brings conduct rules but no compensation scheme, and the unregulated platforms carry neither.
Latvian tax residents pay a flat 25.5% on P2P interest, the personal-income-tax rate on income from capital, with a further 3% on the portion of total annual income above €200,000. Interest is reported and taxed through the annual income tax return unless it comes from a Latvian payer that has already withheld the tax at source, per PwC’s Latvia tax summary.
Mintos, TWINO, VIAINVEST, and Debitum withhold the full 25.5% from Latvian residents’ interest on their notes, per their own tax terms, so that income arrives with the Latvian tax already taken at source. The 3% surcharge isn’t withheld, so an investor whose total annual income passes €200,000 settles it in the annual return. 7 of the 15 platforms in this ranking withhold nothing at their end — the Latvian LANDE among them — and their interest goes in the annual return. The per-platform withholding row sits in each review’s fee table.
Savings-style products that pay their return as the price at which they buy back the loan claims you hold may be taxed differently, so check that treatment with the State Revenue Service or an adviser.